In two related arbitration appeals where appellants and their counsel failed to appear on the last occasion, the High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeals for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( APP 357 of 2005)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL No. 357 OF 2005 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION No.69 OF 2002
Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. ...Appellant Vs. Oyster Marine INC. …Respondent
WITH APPEAL No. 321 OF 2005 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION No.68 OF 2002
Oyster Marine INC. ...Appellant Vs.
The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. ...Respondent
WITH
APPEAL No.. 336 OF 2005 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION No.67 OF 2002
Oyster Marine INC. ...Appellant Vs.
The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. ...Respondent
WITH APPEAL No. 337 OF 2005 IN
ARIBITRATION PETITION No.66 OF 2002
Oyster Marine INC. ...Appellant Vs. The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. ...Respondent
1/2
( APP 357 of 2005)
None for the Appellants None for the Respondents *********** CORAM : V. M. KANADE REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 04, 2016 P.C. :
[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
2/2
Shipping Corporation of India Ltd.
Oyster Marine INC.
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
