In Appeal No. 511 of 2015, the Appellant in a Company Application was absent during the hearing. The Court found the Appellant was not keen on pursuing the matter and dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution.
Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( APP 511 of 2015)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL No. 511 OF 2015 IN COMPANY APPLICATION No.14 OF 2015 IN
COMPANY PETITION No. 400 OF 2010
Lakhvinder S. Randhawa ...Appellant Vs. Vaidehi Akash Housing Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent
None for Appellant None for Respondent
CORAM : V. M. KANADE REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 04, 2016 P.C. :
[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
Lakhvinder S. Randhawa
Vaidehi Akash Housing Pvt. Ltd.
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
