Disposed

Aminuddin Saeed v. the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai and 5 Ors.and Razzak Ahmed Shaikh and 9 Ors(Applicants

Bombay HC26 Feb 2016CHSW/23/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a brief order in PIL No. 2 of 2010 where the court granted chambers summons applications to implead applicants as party respondents. The court directed the registry to carry out amendments and made the summons absolute.

What did the court decide?

Chambers summons made absolute; applicants impleaded as party respondents.

Aminuddin Saeed Vs the Municipal Corporation for… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2016)

chs20,22,28

ssp

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶6

CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.20 OF 2016 WITH
CHAMBER SUMMMONS NO.22 OF 2016 WITH
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.23 OF 2016 IN

¶7

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.2 OF 2010

¶8

Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders

¶9

Mr.R.D.Soni i/b M/s.Shukla Associates for applicants
in CHS 20/2016 and CHS 23/2016

¶10

Mr.Ankit Lohiya a/w Mr.Viral Shukla and Ms Priti Pote
i/b M/s.Shukla & Associates for the applicants in CHS
22/2016

¶11

Mr.Amit Borkar Amicus Curiae

¶12

Mr.Ravi Kadam, Senior Counsel a/w Geeta Joglekar for
the respondent No.1

¶13

Ms Sayli Apte i/b Mr.P.G.Lad for the Respondent Nos.3
and 4

¶14

Mr.Veerendra Tulzapur, Senior Counsel a/w Mr.Nikhil
Sakhardande, Mr.Chirag Mody, Mr.Sajid Suvarna,
Mr.Munif Virjee, Mr.Rishabh Jogani, Ms Prachi Garg i/b
DSK Legal for respondent Nos.5 and 6.

¶15

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
C.V.BHADANG,JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2016.

¶16

P.C.

¶17

1In view of the averments made in
theaffidavitinsupport,the
applicants shall be impleaded as party
respondent in the Writ Petition.
Accordingly, the Chambers Summons are
made absolute. Amendment to be carried
out in four weeks. As the PIL is

¶18

2 chs20,22,28

¶19

treated as Suo Motu petition, the
Registry to carry out the amendment.

¶20

(C.V.BHADANG,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)

Aminuddin Saeed v. the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai and 5 Ors.and Razzak Ahmed Shaikh and 9 Ors(Applicants

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aminuddin Saeed v. the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai and 5 Ors.and Razzak Ahmed Shaikh and 9 Ors(Applicants

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Dakornath Jagannath Bakshi and Ors. Vs Shri Anil Narayan Joshi

Madhukar Deoman Patel and Ors. Vs Malegaon Municipal Corp. and Ors.

M/S. Y.T. Divadkar Vs Union of India through the General Manager and Ors.

Janhit Manch through Its President Vs Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation and 16 Ors.

Aminuddin Saeed Vs the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai and 5 Ors. and Sayeda Waqar and 13 Ors. (Applicants)

Aminuddin Saeed Vs the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai and 5 Ors. and K.D. Sankulker and 11 Ors. (Applicants)