Disposed
Padma D. Rachwani and 2 Ors. v. Rukmini N. Goklani and 5 Ors. and Mrs. Lavina Gope Keswani (Applicant)
Bombay HCCHS/480/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
67-CHS-480-2016.DOC
JSN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 480 OF 2016
IN
SUIT NO. 1398 OF 2009
Lavina Gope Keswani… Applicant
And
Mrs. Padma D. Rachwani (deceased) and others.… Plaintiffs
Versus
Mrs. Rukmani T. Goklani and Others… Defendants
Mr. Raphael D’Souza, for the Plaintiff / Applicant.
Mr. Prasad Patil, i/b Datta Mane for Defendants Nos. 1, 4 and 6.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 15th November 2016
PC:-
1.This is an application to implead the Applicant as Plaintiff
No.1(a) in place of the deceased 1st Plaintiff. There is a very
considerable delay in filing the Chamber Summons. This is
attributed to the fact that there were disputes between the 1st
Plaintiff’s heirs inter se and that these were finally resolved only
recently with the other heirs consenting to the present application
being made.
Page 1 of 2
15th November 2016
67-CHS-480-2016.DOC
2. In view of this, the Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayers (a), (b) and (c) with no order as to costs.
3. Leave to amend without need of reverification.
4. Amendments to be carried out on or before 25th November 2016.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
15th November 2016
Lavina Gope Keswani
Mrs. Padma D. Rachwani
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court