The High Court at Bombay accepted an apology affidavit submitted by the respondent in a contempt petition. The notice against the respondent was discharged, and the contempt petition was disposed of without costs.
Apology accepted; Notice discharged; Contempt Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
926-CNOP51-16.DOC
SHEPHALI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 51 OF 2016
IN
SUIT NO. 2415 OF 1991
Mrs. Preeti Paresh Shah...Petitioner
Versus
Jyotikumar Chunilal Mehta…Respondent
Mr. Chirag Bulsara, with Ms. Jyoti Sinha i/b Negandhi Shah &
Himayatullah, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Tejas Vora, i/b G. K. Vora & Sagar Kasar, for Respondent.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 27th October 2016
PC:-
1.At Mr. Vora's request, the apology stated in the Affidavit
dated 26th October 2016 and in particular paragraph 2 of that
Affidavit are accepted. Further, the statements made in paragraph 11
of that Affidavit are also accepted as undertakings to the Court.
2. The Notice of the Respondent/Contemnor is discharged in these terms.
Page 1 of 2
27th October 2016
926-CNOP51-16.DOC
3. The Contempt Petition is, therefore, disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
27th October 2016
Mrs. Preeti Paresh Shah
Jyotikumar Chunilal Mehta
G. S. Patel, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court