In Civil Application No.21/2016, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, dismissed an application sought by a non-party to modify an order in L.P.A. No.107/2013, holding the application misconceived and not tenable.
Application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CAZ21-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Civil Application No.21/2016 in
L.P.A. No.107/2013 in Writ Petition No.3467/2011
(Subhash Narayan Pise .vs. Nanuram Mohanlal Varma and another )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. P.S. Patil, Advocate for Applicant.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ. DATED : June 17,2016.
This is an application moved by the party who was not a party to the letters patent appeal and is seeking the modification of the order dated 30.11.2015 passed in L.P.A. No.107/2013.
The application is clearly misconceived and not tenable. Application is rejected.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for modification of the impugned order in L.P.A. No.107/2013 by a non-party is tenable.
Subhash Narayan Pise
Nanuram Mohanlal Varma
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
