This order allowed an application for intervention in the public interest litigation. It is a procedural order without substantive decision or reasoning.
Intervention allowed. Date fixed for next S.O.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16.6PIL.30.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 30 OF 2016. (Court on its own motion .vs. The Union of India & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate (Amicus Curiae)for petitioner, Mr. D.P. Thakare, Addl. G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 2, Mr. M.R. Puranik, Advocate for respondent no.5, Mr. M.R. Pillai, Advocate for respondent no. 6, Mr. F.T. Mirza, Advocate with Mr. S.N. Kumar, Advocate for intervenor.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : JUNE 16, 2016.
One week's time is granted by way of last chance at the request of Mr. Pillai, learned Counsel for respondent no.6, for filing reply. It is made clear that in case reply is not filed by the next date, the averments made in the petition will be taken as uncontroverted and the petition will be heard.
C.A.O. NO. 899 OF 2016 :
The application for intervention is allowed. S.O. to 30.6.2016 for hearing.
Judge Judge
J.
Court on its own motion
The Union of India
others
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
