The High Court at Nagpur disposed of an application for condonation of a 130-day delay in filing a review petition. The application prayed for condonation of delay and was allowed in a brief order.
Condonation of delay of 130 days in filing the review application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application [CAO] No. 575 of 2016 IN Misc. Civil Application [Review] St. No. 5702 of 2016 IN Public Interest Litigation No. 93 of 2014 [decided] [Paramjeet Singh Kalsi Vs. State of Mah. & others]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. A.S. Kilor, Adv., for the Applicant-Petitioner. Mr. Ghurde, AGP for respondent nos. 1,2,5 and 7.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND P.B. VARALE, JJ. DATE : 10th June, 2016
This is an application for condonation of delay of 130 days occurred in filing the application for review.
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and delay is condoned.
Misc. Civil Application St. No.5702/16 :
The applicant [Original petitioner], Mr. Paramjeet Singh Kalsi, has applied for review of the order dated 1st
2
October, 2015.
Heard.
No case is made out for invoking the review jurisdiction.
Application for review is, therefore, rejected.
Judge Judge
|hedau|
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 130 days in filing the review application should be condoned.
Paramjeet Singh Kalsi
State of Mah.
B. R. Gavai
P. B. Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
