The civil application was not pressed by the applicants due to a subsequent policy decision by the State Government. The matter was disposed of mere not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Yadav V.G.
12.caw.1983.14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1983 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4466 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. Niteen P. Deshpande, AGP a/w Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for Applicants. Mr. S. A. Sawant for Respondent/Ori. Petitioner.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND
A.A.SAYED,JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 2, 2016.
P.C.
. The learned AGP states that in view of the subsequent policy decision taken by the State Government, the applicants are not pressing this application.
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
