The High Court viewed a criminal writ petition challenging an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 270 r/w 34 IPC. The petitioners sought to quash the FIR registered against them. The court examined the facts and circumstances presented to make a holistic assessment regarding the continuation of criminal proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
wp-1676-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1676 OF 2016
Mayank Jagsibhai Jagani and ors. ...Petitioners v/s. The State of Maharashtra and anr. ...Respondents
Mr.K.M.Savla i/b Mr.Manish Jagani for the Petitioners. Ms.M.H.Mhatre, APP for the Respondent No.1. Mr.Dushyant Purekar for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.S.OKA &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 1 SEPTEMBER 2016
P.C.:
For the reasons separately recorded in the Judgment, the following order is passed:
O R D E R
Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads
thus:
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
1/1
Uday.P.Kambli
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the complaint/FIR should be quashed under Section 482 of the CrPC.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Mayank Jagsibhai Jagani
State of Maharashtra
A.S.Oka
A.A.Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
