Single bench judgment allowing Criminal Application No. 313 of 2015 based on averments in prayer clauses (b) and (c); no substantive reasoning provided.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (c).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Yadav V.G.
1 13a.appw.313.15
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 313 OF 2015
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1952 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. Sachin H. Deokar for Applicant/Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. S.R.Nargolkar i/b. Ms. Meenakshi Sakhare, for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND
A.A.SAYED,JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 2, 2016.
P.C.
. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicants, the learned APP for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and the learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3.
Applicant/Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 1 & 2
Respondent No. 3
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
