Allowed

Smt. Twinkle Sandeep Shah v. Shri. Sandeep Ramesh Shah

Bombay HC8 Dec 2016CAM/363/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed an application for condonation of delay in filing a family court appeal against a divorce decree, upholding the appeal due to established limitations and reasonable explanations provided by the applicant.

What did the court decide?

Rule was made absolute for the applicant, allowing the appeal to be preferred.

Smt. Twinkle Sandeep Shah Vs Shri. Sandeep Ramesh Shah — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2016)

cam-363.15

sng

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2015 IN

¶5

FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST.NO.28413 OF 2015

¶6

Smt. Twinkle Sandeep Shah.	.. Applicant
In the matter between
Smt. Twinkle Sandeep Shah. Vs	.. Appellant
Shri Sandeep Ramesh Shah.	.. Respondent

¶7

Shri Javed Trivedi for the Applicant/Appellant. Ms. Neeta Solanki i/b Kisan Jain & Co for the Respondent.

¶8

CORAM : A.S. OKA & SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ DATED : 8TH DECEMBER 2016

¶9

P.C.

¶10

Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant wife and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent husband. This Application is for condonation of delay in preferring an Appeal against the decree passed by the learned Judge of the Family Court on a Petition filed by the Respondent husband. By the impugned decree, the marriage solemnized between the Applicant and the Respondent has been ordered to be dissolved by a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty.

¶11

sng 2 cam-363.15

¶12

The objection of the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent husband is that the delay is not of 109 or 112 days as claimed by the Applicant, but the delay is more than seven months. She pointed out that even according to the case made out by the Applicant wife, the certified copy of the judgment and decree dated 12^th December 2014 which was applied for on 23^rd January 2015 was made available on 5^th May 2015. Her contention is that the Appeal has been belatedly preferred in November 2015 for which there was no explanation.

¶13

We have considered the submissions. From the record, it appears that the Appeal was filed on 9^th October 2015. As stated earlier, the Application for grant of certified copy of the impugned decree dated 12^th December 2014 was made on 21^st January 2015 and the certified copy was ready on 5^th May 2015 as seen from the certified copy produced alongwith the Appeal.

¶14

Moreover, as held by a recent decision of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Shri Shivram Dodanna Shetty v. Sou.Sharmila Shivram Shetty¹ , though this is a Family Court Appeal, as the Appeal arises from the proceedings under the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the period of limitation of 90 days will be available for preferring an Appeal.

¶15

1 Family Court Appeal No.161 of 2013 - Decided on 1^st December 2016

cam-363.15

sng

Moreover, from Paragraph Nos.3 onwards upto Paragraph 10 of the Application, the Applicant has set out the reasons as to why Appeal could not be filed till October 2015.

¶20

The Applicant wife has suffered a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty.

¶21

In view of the averments made in the Application and considering the fact that a liberal and justice oriented approach will have to be adopted, a case is made out for condonation of delay. Rule is

¶22

made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

¶23

(SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J)

Smt. Twinkle Sandeep Shah v. Shri. Sandeep Ramesh Shah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Twinkle Sandeep Shah v. Shri. Sandeep Ramesh Shah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Upl Limited Vs Union of India and 3 Ors.

Sarfaraz Arzu and 2 Ors. Vs Devendra Fadnavis and 3 Ors.

Adil D Karkaria Vs the Mumbai Repairs and Reconstruction Board and 4 Ors.

Mrs. Pradnya Prakash Deo Vs Mr. Chintamani Vasant Joshi

Vidyarthi Vikas Mitra Mandal, Thru. President Shri Rajendra Bhosale and Anr. Vs Choudhary Deepmala Ramesh and Ors.

Mrs. Priti Nishant Dhengle Vs Mr. Nishant Laxmikant Dhengle