Court allowed the writ petition but dismissed it on grounds of demurrer, noting that the impugned notification was superseded by a later one for the subsequent year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-1219.16
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1219 OF 2016
Sarfaraz Arzu and Ors.
… Petitioners
Vs.
Shri Devendra Fadnavis and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. H.S. Halwasia a/w Ms. S.S. Halwasia i/by M/s. Halwasia for the Petitioners.
Mr. L.T. Satelkar, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : 7th DECEMBER, 2016
P.C.
1 By notification dated 30th November, 2015 the State Government published a list of various dates on which various anniversaries and other events were to be celebrated by the State Government in the calender year 2016. The last one was to be held on 26th November, 2016. Hence, with the passage of time, this Petition will not survive.
2 The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners have a grievance about similar notification published for the year 2017. If that be so, it is for them to adopt appropriate remedy in that behalf. Subject to what is observed above, the Petition is disposed of.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
1 of 1
Sarfaraz Arzu and Ors.
Shri Devendra Fadnavis and Ors.
A.S. OKA
Anuja PrabhuDESSai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
