This single-line order allowed a Civil Application for condonation of delay by 373 days in filing a Family Court Appeal regarding a divorce decree, adopting a liberal and justice-oriented approach.
The Civil Application was allowed in terms of the prayer clause (a) for condonation of delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cam-232.15
sng
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.232 OF 2015 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO.14574 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Ms. Apeksha Dangche i/b M/s. Jay and Co for the Applicant-wife.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ
DATED : 8TH DECEMBER 2016
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the
Applicant. Office note shows that the Respondent
has been duly served. None appears for the
Respondent. There is no reply filed.
and 6 of the Application, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay of 373 days in preferring the Family Court Appeal. By the impugned decree,
2cam-232.15
sng
on a Petition filed by the Petitioner husband, the marriage solemnized between the Applicant and the Respondent is dissolved by a decree of divorce.
( SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay in filing the Family Court Appeal.
Whether the Civil Application allowing condonation of delay should be allowed.
Applicant-wife
Respondent
A.S. Oka
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court