In a one-line order, the High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad allowed an intervention application filed in Civil Application No. 2202 of 2016, which was pending in proceedings related to Writ Petitions No. 249 of 2009 and No. 404 of 2009.
The intervention application is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca220216.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2202 OF 2016 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8947 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITIONS NO.249 OF 2009 AND WRIT PETITION NO.404 OF 2009
Chandrakant s/o Bhaurao Waghmare
Applicant
Versus
Suresh John Sable & others
Respondents
Mr.V.C.Dharurkar, advocate for the applicant. Mr.P.S.Shendurnikar, advocate for Respondent No.1 (petitioner in WP)
Mr.S.K.Kadam, AGP for Respondents No.2 to 4. Mr.A.K.Gawali, advocate for Respondent No.5. Mr.S.S.Jadhavar, advocate for Respondent No.6.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
P.R.BORA, JJ. DATE : 11th March, 2016
PER COURT:
Civil Application seeking intervention is allowed.
P.R.BORA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb/ca220216
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow an intervention application in an ongoing civil appeal and writ petition.
Chandrakant s/o Bhaurao Waghmare
Suresh John Sable & others
R.M. Borde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
