The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad granted leave to withdraw two writ petitions and disposed of them as withdrawn.
Petitions disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 WRIT PETITION NO. 2912 OF 2016
SHITAL EKNATH PATEL AND ANOTHER VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Sonawane Maheshkumar S. AGP for Respondent State : Mr. S.M.Ganachari
905 WRIT PETITION NO. 2917 OF 2016
BAJIRAO BALIRAM PATIL AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Sonawane Maheshkumar S. AGP for Respondent State: Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: March 10, 2016
PER COURT :-
( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
agp/-
SHITAL EKNATH PATEL AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
BAJIRAO BALIRAM PATIL AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
