The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition by observing the availability of an alternate remedy via the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, without entertaining the petition on merits.
No immediate relief; the petitioner is directed to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2 WRIT PETITION NO. 2619 OF 2016
KRISHNAKUMAR GOVINDRAO KACHAWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Chavan Sanjaykumar B. AGP for Respondent State:Mr. S.K.Kadam
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Dated: March 10, 2016
PER COURT :-
( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
agp/-
Krishnakumar Govindrao Kachawar
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
