Dismissed
Yogesh Balasaheb Ingale v. Inspector General of Prison
Bombay HCAPPW/367/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay rejected the applicant's appeal against the rejection of his furlough application. The Court held that since the applicant had previously been granted parole for 90 days after his initial furlough application was rejected, and he subsequently overstayed, the case was not fit for judicial interference.
What did the court decide?
The applicant's criminal application is rejected. No interference is granted to the rejection of the furlough application.