This is a criminal application for condonation of delay. The court found the delay to be only 22 days. It held the delay to be condonable and allowed the application.
Delay of 22 days condoned; application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10_appa_438_2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.438 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.257 OF 2016
Sandeep @ Jounty Mahadeo Jadhav & Anr. ...Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
...
None for the Applicants. Mr. H.J. Dedia, APP for the Respondent -State.
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ
DATED: 6th APRIL, 2016
PC:-
The Applicants have prayed for condonation of delay, which was caused in filing this application. It is seen that delay is only of 22 days.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Megha
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 22 days in filing the criminal application requires condonation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep @ Jounty Mahadeo Jadhav & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
Anujaprabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court