Petitioners seeking release on parole/furlough became infructuous as the State produced a letter showing the petitioner had completed his sentence and been released. Court discharged the rule.
Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.912.2016+_9.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.912 OF 2016
Mangesh Suresh Bhise ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1177 OF 2016
Mangesh Suresh Bhise ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1189 OF 2016
Mangesh Suresh Bhise ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mrs.Nasreen S.K. Ayubi, Advocate appointed for the Petitioner Mr.H.J. Dedia, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: JULY 18, 2016
ORAL ORDER (PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.):
1 / 2
wp.912.2016+_9.doc
Superintendent of Nashik Road Central Prison. The said letter is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The letter states that the petitioner has completed his period of imprisonment and he has been released from the prison.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 / 2
Mangesh Suresh Bhise
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mrudula Bhathkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
