Partly allowed
Shivajirao S/O Shivram Moghe v. State of Mah. Thr. Its Police Station Officer and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPP/250/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
213appp250.16
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Criminal Application (APPP) No.250 of 2016 in Criminal Application (APPP) No.249 of 2016 in Criminal Application (APL) No.618 of 2012 (D)
(Shivajirao Shivram Moghe and anr. vs. State and anr.)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Mr.R.S.Kurekar, Adv. for the applicants. Mrs.S.S.Jachak, A.P.P. for respondent no.1/State.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : 21.3.2016.
Heard.
For the reasons stated in Criminal Application
No.250 of 2016, same is allowed. Delay is condoned.
Criminal Application No.249 of 2016
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Criminal Application (APL) No.618 of 2012 is restored to file.
JUDGE JUDGE
**_jaiswal_*
Shivajirao Shivram Moghe and anr.
State and anr.
B.R.GAVAI
A.S.CHANDURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court