This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crap563.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 563 OF 2016
Anant s/o Namdeo Gaikwad...Applicant
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and others
...Respondents
.....
Shri S.R.Choukidar, advocate for the applicant
Shri M.M.Nerlikar, A.P.P. for resp. nos. 1 & 2
.....
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE
AND
SANGITRAO S.PATIL, JJ.
DATED: 24.08.2016
PER COURT :
In view of subsequent events occurred
after filing of this application, the application
has rendered infructuous, in as much as, already
trial is commenced and 2-3 witnesses have been
examined, as informed by the learned counsel for
the applicant.
accordingly.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.)
dbm/crap563.16
Anant s/o Namdeo Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court