An application filed by Shaikh Rashid was dismissed solely on the grounds that the applicant sought liberty to withdraw it, which was granted.
Liberty to withdraw the application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2286 OF 2016
(Shaikh Rashid s/o Shaikh Rasul Vs. The State of
Maharashtra and another)
Mr. K.N. Shaikh, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. A.R. Borulkar, A.P.P. for respondent No. 1
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 23rd August, 2016
PER COURT:
Learned counsel Smt. Mansi P. Joshi submits
that she has instructions to appear for respondent No.2.
The service of notice on respondent No. 2 is thus
complete.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the
applicant, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw
the application. Liberty granted as prayed for. The
application is dismissed as withdrawn.
[ SANGITRAO S. PATIL ] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE
npj/criapln2286-2016
Shaikh Rashid
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court