In Criminal Application No. 1266 of 2016, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad rejected an application wherein the applicant sought leave to amend the application and approached the High Court for discharge pending a filed chargesheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1266 OF 2016 (Lata d/o Devidas Nikalje Vs. The State of Maharashtra and another)
Mr. A.S. Shejwal, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. S.W. Munde, A.P.P. for respondent No. 1/State
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 23rd August, 2016
PER COURT:
Heard.
2. During pendency of this application, the
chargesheet is filed. The learned counsel appearing for
the applicant seeks leave to amend this application. The
said prayer stands rejected.
3.In case the applicant is advised, he can
approach the concerned Court for filing an application
for his discharge from the proceedings. We are not
inclined to entertain this application. Hence, the
criminal application stands rejected.
[ SANGITRAO S. PATIL ] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE
npj/criapln1266-2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a criminal application during the pendency of a filed chargesheet when the applicant sought leave to amend it.
Lata d/o Devidas Nikalje
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court