This court disposed of a criminal application by rejecting it on the ground that the investigation is in progress. The applicant was permitted to file an appropriate remedy upon the filing of the charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 45-3133.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3133 OF 2016
Suresh s/o. Govindrao Kulkarni..Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and anr...Respondents
Mr.Amit Mukhedkar, Advocate for Applicant
Mr.S.W.Mundhe, APP for respondent no.1
Mr.R.K.Ingole-Patil, Advocate for respondent no.2
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 20, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2.Perused the investigation papers. At this
stage, we are not inclined to entertain this
application. In our opinion, it is not appropriate
to elaborate the reasons since the investigation
is in progress.
2 45-3133.odt
3.The application is rejected. Needless to
observe that the applicant is at liberty to take
out an appropriate remedy in the event of filing
of Charge Sheet by the Investigating Officer.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.][S.S. SHINDE, J.]
kbp
Suresh
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court