Application withdrawn with liberty granted. Dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the application granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
crap2681.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2681 OF 2016
Raju Shridharrao Dighole
and another
...Applicants
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and another...Respondents
.....
Shri D.B.Thoke, advocate for the applicants
Shri M.M.Nerlikar, A.P.P. for respondent no. 1
Shri G.J.Pahilwan, advocate for respondent no.2
.....
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S.PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 19th SEPTEMBER, 2016
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the applicants, on
instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the
application. Liberty granted as prayed for.
2.Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.)
dbm/crap2681.16
Raju Shridharrao Dighole and another
The State of Maharashtra and another
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court