Dismissed

Sau. Kalpana Abhiman Balsane. v. 1. Salman Latif Ansari.

Bombay HC19 Sept 2016WP/668/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Writ Petition seeking production of the petitioner's minor daughter and custody transfer. The child appeared in court, expressed a desire to stay with her husband and not meet parents. Consequently, the Court found no need for further orders and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted regarding custody production; petition dismissed as no further order was necessary.

Sau. Kalpana Abhiman Balsane. Vs 1. Salman… — Child Custody and Guardianship | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

crwp668.16

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD

¶4

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 668 OF 2016

¶5

Kalpana w/o Abhiman Balsane...Petitioner

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

Salman Latif Ansari
and others

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

.....

¶10

Shri H.V.Tungar, advocate h/f

¶11

Shri C.R.Deshpande, advocate for the petitioner
Shri A.R.Syed, advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 2
Shri D.R.Kale, A.P.P. for respondent nos.3 & 4

¶12

.....

¶13

CORAM : S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S.PATIL, JJ.

¶14

DATED : 19th SEPTEMBER, 2016

¶15

PER COURT :

¶16

This petition is filed to direct

¶17

respondent nos. 1 and 2 to produce Pradnya, the
daughter of the petitioner before this Court and
to hand over her custody to the petitioner.

¶18

2.Smt.Parveen Salman Ansari @ Pradnya

¶19

Abhiman Balsane is present before this Court. She

¶20

is identified by Advocate Shri P.B.Pawar. On

¶21

interacting with her, she stated that she is
staying with her husband and in-laws. She desires

¶22

2crwp668.16

¶23

to stay with the husband. She does not wish to
meet her parents.

¶24

3.In that view of the matter and the fact
that Smt. Parveen @ Pradnya is present before this

¶25

Court, no further orders are necessary in the
present Writ Petition.

¶26

4.Criminal Writ Petition stands disposed of
accordingly.

¶27

 (SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.)

¶28

dbm/crwp668.16

Sau. Kalpana Abhiman Balsane. v. 1. Salman Latif Ansari.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sau. Kalpana Abhiman Balsane. v. 1. Salman Latif Ansari.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sau Chandrakalabai W/O Sheshrao Kharat and Anr. Vs the Secretary and Other

Mukund S/O. Bharat Gofne and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Kalabai Eknath Navle Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vijay Nagu Kamble Vs the State of Maharashtra

1. Raju Shridharrao Dighole. Vs 1. the State of Maharashtra.

Varsha W/O Praful Bramhecha and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.