Criminal application withdrawn by applicants' counsel. Court granted liberty to withdraw and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
crap2455.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2455 OF 2016
Shaikh Raju s/o Shaikh
Mehboob and another...Applicants
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and another...Respondents
.....
Shri A.P.Gaikwad, advocate h/f
Shri S.S.Kazi, advocate for the applicants
Shri A.R.Borulkar, A.P.P. for respondent no.1
Shri G.K.Thigale (Naik), advocate h/f
Shri S.M.Sangle, advocate for respondent no.2
.....
CORAM : S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S.PATIL, JJ.
DATED: 8.9.2016
PER COURT :
Learned counsel appearing for the
applicants, on instructions, seeks liberty to
withdraw the application. Liberty granted as
prayed for.
2.Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.) (S.S.SHINDE, J.)
dbm/crap2455.16
Shaikh Raju s/o Shaikh Mehboob and another
The State of Maharashtra and another
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court