The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed an application for anticipatory bail. The court held that the facts regarding property loss, prior enmity, and the applicant fleeing the scene did not make a case for anticipatory bail.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cr. Appln. 2112-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2112 OF 2016
Rohan Vilas Torne
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Mr. A.B. Kale, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for the respondent-State
CORAM: M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 18/04/2016
ORAL ORDER:
Heard both sides.
2.The present applicant, who is apprehending
arrest at the hands of Shrirampur Taluka Police
Station, Dist. Ahmednagar in crime no.I-41 of 2015 for
the offences punishable under section 436 of the Indian
Penal Code, is praying for his release on bail, in the
event of his arrest.
3.The complaint as well as the accompanying
documents would show that the incident has occurred on
17/03/2015 at 4:45 pm. The complaint is filed
immediately. It would show that there is previous
2 Cr. Appln. 2112-2016
enmity between the complainant and the family of the
present applicant. According to the complainant and
the witnesses from the neighbourhood, the present
applicant was seen running away from the spot when the
fire broke out. It would also show that property worth
Rs.35,000/- from the dwelling house of the complainant
was gutted in the fire.
4.Upon hearing both sides and considering all
the facts on record, no case for grant of anticipatory
bail is made out. The Application is therefore
dismissed.
[M.T. JOSHI]
JUDGE
arp/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is maintainable where the applicant apprehends arrest for an FIR regarding arson with a relationship of previous enmity?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohan Vilas Torne
The State of Maharashtra
M.T. JOUSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court