Dismissed

Raosaheb Vishwanath Tagad v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC16 Apr 2016APPLN/1681/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Criminal Application for bail, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad rejected the prayer. The applicant, serving a life sentence for murder on parole, was charged with offences under sections 420 et seq. of IPC. The court dismissed the application due to the gravity of the offence and the applicant's history of document fabrication. Relied_on: No release for applicant as

What did the court decide?

The application for release on bail was dismissed. No order as to costs.

Raosaheb Vishwanath Tagad Vs the State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 Cri. Appln. 1681-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1681 OF 2016

¶4

Raosaheb Vishwanath Tagad
Age 31 years, Occu.: Labour,
R/o Tapowan Road, Ahmednagar,
Dist. Ahmednagar.. Applicant

¶5

Vs.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra
Through Investigating Officer,
Tofkhana Police Station,
Ahmednagar, Dist. Ahmednagar

¶7

.. Respondent

¶8

.....

¶9

Mr. R.V. Gore, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. A.R. Borulkar, APP for the respondent-State

¶10

......

¶11

CORAM : M.T. JOSHI, J.
 DATED : 16/04/2016

¶12

ORAL ORDER:

¶13

Heard both sides.

¶14

2.The present applicant, who is arrested by

¶15

Tofkhana Police Station, Dist. Ahmednagar in Crime
no.I-403 of 2014 for the offences punishable under

¶16

section 420, 465, 467, 468, 470, 471 r/w. 34 of the
Indian Penal Code, is praying for his release on bail.

¶17

2 Cri. Appln. 1681-2016

¶18

3.The complaint filed by the P.S.I. Laxman Kale

¶19

would show that the present applicant is already
convicted for the offence punishable under section 302
of the Indian Penal Code and as such is serving the
life term in the jail. While he was released on
parole, he fabricated documents to show that he was a
child in conflict with law at the time of the
commission of the offence and, therefore, tried to get
his release from the High Court of Judicature of
Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad in Criminal Appeal No.
179 of 2008. As this Court has directed to make
enquiry, finding the documents suspicious, it was
ultimately found that the applicant has prepared
fabricated documents regarding his school leaving
certificate, while he was found to have not even taken
admission in the said school.

¶20

4.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that
the applicant is serving the life term, however, as he

¶21

is an under-trial prisoner in the present case, he is

¶22

3 Cri. Appln. 1681-2016

¶23

unable to get his release on parole.

¶24

5. Learned A.P.P. opposed the application.

¶25

6. Considering all the material on record and the

¶26

seriousness of the offence and the fact that the
present applicant is already serving the life term, no

¶27

case is made out for his release on bail.

¶28

7.The Application is therefore dismissed.

¶29

 Sd/-

¶30

JUDGE

¶31

arp/-

Raosaheb Vishwanath Tagad v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raosaheb Vishwanath Tagad v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok S/O. Anaji Wakchaure Vs the State of Maharashtra

The State of Maharashtra Vs Sandhya W/O Sharadchandra Deshpande and Other

Sayyed Matin S/O Sayyed Rasool Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mohammad Mehboob Rafique Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mohammad Mehboob Rafique Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ganesh S/O. Sahebrao Matade Vs the State of Maharashtra