The High Court at Bombay Bench Aurangabad allowed the withdrawal of Criminal Application No. 1917 of 2016 and directed the Sessions Judge to expedite the hearing for the under-trial prisoner.
Application allowed to be withdrawn; hearing in trial expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
criapln1917-2016
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1917 OF 2016
(Musakhan Vahedkhan Pathan Vs. The State of Maharashtra)
Mr. Satej S. Jadhav, Advocate for the applicant
Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.P.P. for the respondent-State
CORAM: M.T. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 16/04/2016
ORAL ORDER:
1.Heard.
2.Upon hearing, learned counsel for the
applicant, on instructions of the applicant, submits
that the applicant wishes to withdraw the present
application. He further submits that the hearing in the
case may be directed to be expedited.
2.Accordingly, the present application is allowed
to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
3.Since the applicant would be an under-trial
prisoner, the learned Sessions Judge is requested to
expedite the hearing in the trial.
npj/criapln1917-2016
Musakhan Vahedkhan Pathan
The State of Maharashtra
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court