Disposed

Parmeshwar S/O Jadhav Chavhan v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC20 Apr 2016APPLN/2036/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Five crpc applications, considering collectively as one, were filed by various applicants. Learned counsel sought leave to withdraw the applications with liberty to avail of legal remedies at an appropriate stage. The court marked the applications as disposed of as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the applications with liberty to avail of remedies available in law was granted.

Parmeshwar S/O Jadhav Chavhan Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

{1}

¶2

cr applicatioin 2036.16 & others.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATIOIN NO.2036 OF 2016

¶5

Parmeshwar s/o Jadhav Chavan Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2058 OF 2016

¶10

Ashok S/o Dattatraya Patil Applicant

¶11

Versus

¶12

The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents

¶13

WITH

¶14

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2059 OF 2016 Bhaskar S/o Narayan Pawar Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2060 OF 2016 Kiransingh S/o Narayansingh Rajput Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents

¶15

WITH

¶16

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2061 OF 2016 Ishwar S/o Raghunath Patil Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents

¶17

{2} cr applicatioin 2036.16 & others.odt

¶18

WITH

¶19

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2062 OF 2016

¶20

Yashwant S/o Baliram Baisane Applicant Versus

¶21

The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents

¶22

WITH

¶23

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2063 OF 2016

¶24

Dilip s/o Shriram Sonawane Applicant

¶25

Versus

¶26

The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents

¶27

WITH

¶28

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2064 OF 2016

¶29

Bharatsing s/o Vitthalsing Sisode Applicant Versus

¶30

The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents

¶31

WITH

¶32

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2065 OF 2016

¶33

Vinayak s/o Jaganpuri Gosavi Applicant

¶34

Versus

¶35

The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents

¶36

WITH

¶37

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2066 OF 2016

¶38

Prabhakar s/o Jagannath Borse Applicant Versus

¶39

The State of Maharashtra and another Respondents

¶40

{3} cr applicatioin 2036.16 & others.odt

¶41

Mrs.Ashwini S. Hoge Patil advocate for the applicants Mr.S.J. Salgare, Assistant Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1

¶42

CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ (Date : 20^th APRIL, 2016.)

¶43

PER COURT :-

¶44

1 Learned counsel appearing for the applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the applications with liberty to avail of remedies available in law, at an appropriate stage.

¶45

2 Leave granted with liberty as prayed for.

¶46

3 Applications are disposed of as withdrawn.

¶47

(K.L. WADANE, J) (R.M.BORDE, J)

¶48

vbd

Parmeshwar S/O Jadhav Chavhan v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parmeshwar S/O Jadhav Chavhan v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Majlum Dost Miyan Ansari Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kashiram @ Pintaya Rama Salunkhe Vs the State of Maharashtra

Bala Vastad Digambar Shitole Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sayyed Sharekh @ Raju S/O. Sayyad Zafar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dadarao @ Chandrakant S/O Gangaram Harkal Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sharad S/O Namdev Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra