The court dismissed an application seeking quashment of an FIR regarding sand transportation. The vehicle belonged to the petitioner's brother, and the court found no case for quashment as the petition was devoid of substance.
Application for quashment of FIR was dismissed; petition disposed of as devoid of substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
25 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2033 OF 2016
SHARAD S/O NAMDEV PAWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. P.S. Anerao APP for Respondents: Mr. S.J. Salgire
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ. Date: April 20, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 It is informed that the vehicle which was used for transportation of the sand belongs to the brother of the petitioner.
2 In this view of the matter, no case is made out for directing quashment of the FIR. The petition is devoid of substance and stands disposed of.
( K.L. WADANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR regarding transportation of sand should be quashed.
Whether a case is made out for directing quashment of the FIR.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sharad S/O Namdev Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
K.L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
