The court permitted the withdrawal of criminal appeal number 143/2016 because the appellant filed a consolidated appeal pending before it. Consequently, the associated criminal application was also disposed of.
Criminal Appeal No.143 of 2016 permitted to be withdrawn; Criminal Application No.1533 of 2016 disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
904 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.143 OF 2016 WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1533 OF 2016
SAYYED SHAREKH @ RAJU S/O. SAYYAD ZAFAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.C. Patil Ashtekar APP for Respondents: Mr. D.R. Kale
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & K.L. WADANE, JJ. Date: April 20, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 In view of purshis, presented on record, marked ‘X’, the Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn.
2 In view of withdrawal of the appeal, criminal application does not survive and stands disposed of.
3 The withdrawal of the instant appeal is for the reason that the appellant has already presented an appeal bearing No.77/2016 and the same is admitted and pending consideration. Withdrawal of the appeal shall not have any effect on the pending appeal.
( K.L. WADANE, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
Sayyed Sharekh @ Raju
The State of Maharashtra
K.L. Wadane
R.M. Borge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
