This single-paragraph order allows Criminal Application No.1855 of 2015, condoning the delay caused in filing it, and disposes of the matter without substantive discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cra1855.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1855 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1854 OF 2015
The State of Maharashtra
...APPLICANT
VERSUS
1) Vikas Haridas Dhotare,
2) Jayashri Haridas Dhotare,
3) Kailas Haridas Dhotare.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.M.M. Nerlikar, A.P.P. for Applicant.
Mr.Rajendra Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent
Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 19TH OCTOBER, 2016
ORDER :
.Heard. For the reasons stated in the
Application, the Application is allowed. The delay
cra1855.15
2
caused in filing the Application is condoned. The
Application stands disposed of, accordingly.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
asb/OCT16
The State of Maharashtra
Vikas Haridas Dhotare
Jayashri Haridas Dhotare
Kailas Haridas Dhotare
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court