Allowed

The State of Maharashtra v. Vikas Haridas Dhotare and Ors.

Bombay HC19 Oct 2016APPLN/1854/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment admits a Criminal Appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra. The High Court allowed the application for leave to appeal, finding prima facie that the trial court's findings were inconsistent with prosecution evidence. Directions were given for respondents to furnish personal bonds before the Registrar.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; Appeal admitted; Respondents directed to furnish personal bond of Rs. 10,000 each with surety.

The State of Maharashtra Vs Vikas Haridas Dhotare… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

cra1854.15

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1854 OF 2015

¶6

The State of Maharashtra

¶7

...APPLICANT
 VERSUS

¶8

1) Vikas Haridas Dhotare,

¶9

2) Jayashri Haridas Dhotare,

¶10

3) Kailas Haridas Dhotare.

¶11

...RESPONDENTS

¶12

 ...
 Mr.M.M. Nerlikar, A.P.P. for Applicant.
 Mr.Rajendra Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent
 Nos.1 to 4.

¶13

...

¶14

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
 SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
 DATE : 19TH OCTOBER, 2016

¶15

ORDER :

¶16

. Heard learned A.P.P. appearing for the

¶17

State and learned counsel appearing for
Respondents.

¶18

2. We have perused the findings recorded by

¶19

cra1854.15

¶20

¶21

the trial Court. Prima facie, it appears that

¶22

findings recorded by the trial Court are not in
consonance with the evidence brought on record by
the prosecution. Hence the case is established for
admission of the Appeal, allowing the Application
seeking leave to Appeal.

¶23

3.The Criminal Application is allowed in
terms of prayer clauses (A), (B), (C), (D) and
(F). Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

4.Appeal Admit. On admission Mr. Deshmukh,

¶25

learned counsel waives service of notice for all
the Respondents.

¶26

5.Respondent Nos.1 to 3 should furnish
Personal Bond of Rs.10,000/- each with one surety
in the like amount each, before the Registrar
(Judicial) of this Court.

¶27

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
asb/OCT16

The State of Maharashtra v. Vikas Haridas Dhotare and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Maharashtra v. Vikas Haridas Dhotare and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dattanand Baban Kure and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Avinash S/O Mahadeo Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shaikh Hasnoddin Shaikh Kamaloddin Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Pandurang S/O. Namdeo Rankhamb Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

The State of Maharashtra Vs Vikas Haridas Dhotare and Ors.

Shaikh Rauf Abdul Raheman Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.