Dismissed

Avinash S/O Mahadeo Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC18 Oct 2016APPLN/1921/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Appellate Side, Bench at Aurangabad, rejected a criminal application seeking bail pending appeal, holding that no case is made out for a grant of bail based on the trial court's record and that elaboration on evidence is unnecessary pending the appeal's finalization.

What did the court decide?

The application for bail is rejected and stands dismissed.

Avinash S/O Mahadeo Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1921.15appln

¶2

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

¶6

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1921 OF 2015 IN APEAL/386/2015 WITH APEAL/386/2015

¶7

AVINASH S/O MAHADEO JADHAV VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶9

...

¶10

Advocate for applicant : Mr.G.G. Kadam
APP for Respondent/State : Mr. D.R. Kale

¶11

...

¶12

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
 Dated: October 18, 2016

¶13

Heard.

¶14

2.We have considered the submissions of
the learned counsel appearing for the
applicant and the learned A.P.P.
appearing for the Respondent/State.

¶15

3.We have carefully perused the notes
of evidence. Prima facie, the findings
recorded by the trial Court appear to be
in consonance with the evidence brought

¶16

1921.15appln

¶17

¶18

on record. The applicant was not on bail
during the trial. We do not wish to
elaborate on the evidence since the
appeal filed by the applicant is pending.
No case is made out for grant of bail.
Hence the application stands rejected.

¶19

4.The Registry of this Court shall send
original Record and Proceedings to the
Registry of the learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Omerga. Upon receiving
the original record and proceedings by
the Registry of the Additional Sessions
Judge, Omerga, the Registry of concerned
Court shall prepare the paper book and
send it back along with original record
and proceedings, as expeditiously as
possible, and preferably within three
months from receipt of the original
record and proceedings.

¶20

(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J)

¶21

sga/

Avinash S/O Mahadeo Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Avinash S/O Mahadeo Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmibai W/O Shivdas Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sagar S/O Ashok Nagre and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Uttam Haribhau Gaikwad and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Dattanand Baban Kure and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shaikh Hasnoddin Shaikh Kamaloddin Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

The State of Maharashtra Vs Sunil Madhukar Nagare and Others