Court appointed counsel for applicant seeking temporary bail pending wife's delivery. Application deemed infructuous because the underlying appeal was already decided, resulting in disposal without granting relief.
No bail granted; application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 503 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 99 OF 2010
Suresh Janardan Mhatre
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
| Appearances |
................... |
|---|---|
| None for the Applicant | |
| Mrs. A.S. Pai | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 7, 2016.
P.C.:
Hence, we appoint Advocate Mr. Sachin Chandan to
represent the applicant in this application.
ground that his wife is due for delivery.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
before this Court. This Court has allowed the said appeal.
bail is infructuous. Hence, the application is disposed of.
[ SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether temporary bail under Article 21 of the Constitution should be granted to a convicted applicant whose appeal has already been decided by this Court.
Whether the application for temporary bail is viable when the underlying criminal appeal has already been allowed by this Court.
Suresh Janardan Mhatre
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
