This Criminal Application filed by a life convict convicted under section 302 IPC was rejected. The High Court refused bail despite submission of completed half-term, citing custody since 2008. Marriage grounds were also dismissed due to lack of fixed date. Hearing expedited.
The bail application is rejected. Hearing expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
appa.1234.2015_7.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1234 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.128 OF 2012
Noor Mohamad Sayed Mohd. Pathan ... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mrs.Nasreen S.K. Ayubi, Advocate appointed for the Applicant Mrs.U.V. Kejriwal, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: JULY 27, 2016
P.C.:
1 / 3
appa.1234.2015_7.doc
2 / 3
appa.1234.2015_7.doc
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
3 / 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant, convicted under section 302 IPC, should be released on bail considering the pendency of the mercy petition.
Whether the applicant has completed half of his life term of imprisonment since 2008 to warrant bail release.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Noor Mohamad Sayed Mohd. Pathan
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mrudula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
