Partition suit on the filing of a consent declaration the High Court affirmed the consent terms and disposed of the company petition and the accompanying notice of motion without adjudication.
Consent terms were affirmed and the appeal was disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
dssherla
907-app-525-16 @ nmast2411-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 525 OF 2016
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 558 OF 2014 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2411 OF 2016
Supreme Infrastructure India Limited .. Appellant.
V/s.
Mr. Champshi M. Shah .. Respondent.
Mr. Neville Majra, Ms Shahista Pathan, Mr. Saqib Gigani i/b Yusuf & Associates for the Appellant.
Mr. Amol Doijode a/w. Vinod Sharma for the Respondent.
CORAM: DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. & M.S.SONAK, J.
DATE : 8 DECEMBER 2016.
P.C.
1] Parties have placed on record consent terms, which is marked as Annexure-X for the purpose of identification. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms placed on record.
2] In view of the disposal of the main appeal, the notice of motion does not survive and the same is disposed of accordingly.
( CHIEF JUSTICE)
(M.S.SONAK, J.)
1 of 1
Supreme Infrastructure India Limited
Mr. Champshi M. Shah
Dr. Manjula Chellur
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
