The Bombay High Court disposed of the appeal and the notice of motion based on consent terms filed by the parties, marking the settlement agreement as an annexure and leaving nothing else for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
dssherla
906-app-524
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 524 OF 2016
IN
COMPANY PETITION NO. 605 OF 2014 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2408 OF 2016
Supreme Infrastructure India Limited .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. MITC Rolling Mills Private Limited .. Respondent.
Mr. Neville Majra, Ms Shahista Pathan, Mr. Saqib Gigani i/b Yusuf & Associates for the Appellant.
Mr. Amol Doijode a/w. Vinod Sharma for the Respondents.
CORAM: DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. & M.S.SONAK, J.
DATE : 8 DECEMBER 2016.
P.C.
1] Parties have placed on record consent terms, which is marked as Annexure-X for the purpose of identification. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms placed on record.
2] In view of the disposal of the main appeal, the notice of motion does not survive and the same is disposed of accordingly.
( CHIEF JUSTICE)
(M.S.SONAK, J.)
1 of 1
SUPREME INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LIMITED
M/S. MITC ROLLING MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
