Order directing Registry to reconstruct missing appeal files after counsel promised to supply a complete set, with a one-month timeline for report submission. Admitted as ok quality despite OCR noise.
Registry to reconstruct missing files of appeal within two weeks and report in Chamber within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appl681.05
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L.) NO.681 OF 2005
Shri Narendra Chunilal Soni @ Patadia & Anr. … Appellants Vs. M/s. Choksi Arvind Jewellers & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. S.M. Sharma i/by M/s. M.M. Vashi for the Appellants.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & P.D. NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 18th MARCH, 2016
P.C.
. Perused the order dated 14th December, 2015. It is the duty of the Registry to reconstruct the missing files of the Appeals. The leaned counsel appearing for the Appellants states that the Appellants will supply a complete set of the Appeal compilation to the Registry. The Registry shall ensure that the files are reconstructed within a period of two weeks from today. The report of reconstruction shall be produced by the Registry in Chamber within a period of one month from today.
(P.DNAIK, J ) (A.S. OKA, J )
1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
nullReferred¶11
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Narendra Chunilal Soni @ Patadia & Anr.
M/s. Choksi Arvind Jewellers & Anr.
A.S. OKA
P.D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
