Allowed

shri narendra chunilal soni alias patadia and Anr. v. m/s choksi arvind jewelleers and Anr.

Bombay HC24 Aug 2005APP/43/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court heard counsels for both parties in an appeal (lodging) and a notice of motion. It admitted the appeal, granted leave under Rule 142 of the High Court Original Side Rules for taking out a Notice of Motion, and made the notice absolute.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to Appellants to take out Notice of Motion; Notice made absolute.

shri narendra chunilal soni alias patadia and Anr. vs… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2005)

¶1

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶2

 Appeal (Loding) No. 681 of 2005
 in
 Show Cause Notice No. 2 of 2005
 in
 Company Application No. 310 of 2003
 in
 Company Application No. 277 of 2002
 in

¶3

 Company Petition No. 258 of 2002

¶4

 Shri Narendra Chunilal Soni & Patadia
 & Anr. .. Appellants
 V/s.
 M/s. Choksi Arvind Jewellers & Anr. .. Respondents

¶5

 Mr. N.M. Vashi for the Appellants

¶6

 Ms. Dhanshree Rane i/b. M/s. Kiran Jain & Co. for the
 Respondents

¶7

 CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ.
DATED : 24.08.2005.

¶8

P.C.:-

¶9

 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellants and

¶10

 the Respondents. Appeal is admitted. The learned
 counsel for the Respondents waives service. The
 learned counsel for the Appellants undertakes to get
 the Appeal numbered within a period of two weeks from
 today.

¶11

 (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)

¶12

 (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶13

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶14

 Notice of Motion No. ____ of 2005
 in
 Appeal (Lodging) No. 681 of 2005
 in
 Show Cause Notice No. 2 of 2005
 in
 Company Application No. 310 of 2003
 in
 Company Application No. 277 of 2002
 in
 Company Petition No. 258 of 2002

¶15

 Shri Narendra Chunilal Soni
 @ Patadia & Anr. .. Appellants
 V/s.
 M/s. Choksi Arvind Jewellers & Anr. .. Respondents

¶16

 Mr. N.M. Vashi for the Appellants

¶17

 Ms. Dhanshree Rane i/b. M/s. Kiran Jain & Co. for the
 Respondents

¶18

 CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ.
DATED : 24.08.2005.

¶19

P.C.:-

¶20

 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellants and

¶21

 the Respondents. Leave under Rule 142 of the High
 Court Original Side Rules is granted to the Appellants
 to take out the Notice of Motion. The learned counsel
 for the Respondents waives service. As we have already
 admitted the Appeal and for the reasons stated in the
 affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, Notice of
 Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

¶22

 (DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)

¶23

 (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

shri narendra chunilal soni alias patadia and Anr. v. m/s choksi arvind jewelleers and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

shri narendra chunilal soni alias patadia and Anr. v. m/s choksi arvind jewelleers and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

shri narendra chunilal soni alias patadia and Anr. vs m/s choksi arvind jewelleers and Anr.

M/S. Galaxy International vs Union of India and Ors.

everest flavours Ltd. vs the commissione o sales tax,maha.mum

everest flavours Ltd. vs the commissione o sales tax,maha.mum