The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of writ petition no. 9383 of 2015 without entertaining it, citing the availability of an alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp9383.15.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 9383 OF 2015
Sudhir s/o Premnath Komatwar .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.R. Kedar, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.N. Kendre, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P. R. BORA, JJ.
DATE : 15th OCTOBER, 2015.
PER COURT :
( P.R. BORA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb
Sudhir s/o Premnath Komatwar
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
