The Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, rejected a writ petition by a nephew challenging an unauthorized construction. The Court found the petition arose from personal grievance and left the factual issue for the local authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp9381.15.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 9381 OF 2015
Sanjay s/o Madhavrao Pinate & another .. PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. H.V. Patil, advocate for petitioners.
Mr. S.N. Kendre, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P. R. BORA, JJ. DATE : 15th OCTOBER, 2015.
PER COURT :
( P.R. BORA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in a writ petition alleging unauthorized construction arising from personal animosity.
Sanjay s/o Madhavrao Pinate & another
The State of Maharashtra & others
R.M. Borda
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
