Petition questioned refusal to appoint a third examiner for re-assessment of Engineering Drawing marks. Court held High Court lacks expertise in academic evaluation. Petition rejected as devoid of substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp10351.15.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10351 OF 2015
Ms Pooja d/o Aniruddha Kakde .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. N.L. Jadhav, advocate for petitioner. Mr. P.S. Patil, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & P. R. BORA, JJ. DATE : 15th OCTOBER, 2015.
PER COURT :
( P.R. BORA ) JUDGE dyb
( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere in the academic evaluation of students regarding re-assessment of marks.
Pooja d/o Aniruddha Kakde
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
