The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench disposed of Writ Petition No.795/2015 by ruling that the purpose of the petitioner was served due to subsequent developments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP795-14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No.795/2015
(Ku. Sweety Kishor Bhisikar .vs. Sub Divisional Officer, Umarkhed and another. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. A.M. Balpande, Advocate for Petitioner.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. DATED : March 05, 2015.
In view of the subsequent developments, the purpose of the petitioner is served. Writ petition is disposed of as such.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Ku. Sweety Kishor Bhisikar
Sub Divisional Officer, Umarkhed
another
B.R. Gavai
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
