Review application allowed condoning delay of 23 days Order dated 11.12.2014 recalled Writ Petition No. 4627/2014 restored to file
Order dated 11.12.2014 recalled and Writ Petition No.4627/2014 restored to file
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CAO235-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
C.A.O. No.235/2015 in M.C.A. St. No.2209/2015 (For Review)
in
Writ Petition No. 4627/2014 (D)
(Ku. Neeta Amritlal Shahu .vs. State of Mah. Through its Secretary,
Department of Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. B.G. Kulkarni, Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. K.R. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr. G.G. Mishra, Advocate with Mrs. I.L. Bodade, Advocate for Respondent no.2.
Mr. N.M. Kolhe, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4. Mr. S. Zia Qazi, Advocate for Respondents 5 & 7. Mr. S.A. Pathak, Advocate for Respondent No.6.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai &
Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. DATED : March 04, 2015.
For the reasons stated, the application is allowed. The delay of 23 days in filing the application for review is condoned.
M.C.A. St. No.2209/2015
This is an application for review of the order dated 11.12.2014 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.4627/2014.
Since by the said order this Court has passed certain orders which have the effect of adversely affecting the rights of the respondents No. 5 to 7 who were not the petitioners and in effect while denying the
2
CAO235-15.odt
relief to the petitioner, this Court has also passed an order which has resulted in the respondents no.5 to 7 losing their employment, we are inclined to invoke review jurisdiction.
In that view of the matter, the application is allowed. The order dated 11.12.2014 is recalled. The Writ Petition No. 4627/2014 is restored to file.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 23 days in filing the review application should be condoned.
Ku. Neeta Amritlal Shahu
State of Mah. Through its Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai
B.R. Gavai
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
