Writ petition challenging a motion of no confidence. The court held that in a democratic setup, the majority's will prevails, and the petitioner should face the motion without judicial interference.
Petition rejected; no interference with the no confidence motion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP108-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No.108/2015
(Dr. Vivek Vishwanath Mane .vs. The Collector, Washim an another )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. A.M. Ghare, Advocate for Petitioner.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai &
Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. DATED : March 05, 2015.
The petition involves consideration of motion of no confidence motion.
In a democratic set up, the will of the majority must be permitted to prevail. The petitioner should not shy of facing a no confidence motion if he is so sure that he has support of the requisite majority.
In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to interfere. Rejected.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the motion of no confidence against the petitioner.
Dr. Vivek Vishwanath Mane
The Collector, Washim
B.R. Gavai
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
