The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangbad held that a writ petition became infructuous due to subsequent events and was disposed of as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGBAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 593 OF 2015
M/S M. R. MANDAP DECORATION AND TENT HOUSE, PARBHANI VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Syed G. R. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.D. Kaldate
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: February 16, 2015
PER COURT :-
In view of the subsequent events occurred after filing of this Petition, the Petition has become infructuous, same stands disposed of as infructuous.
( A.M. BADAR, J. )
( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
sga/-
M/S M. R. Mandap Decoration and Tent House, Parbhani
The State of Maharashtra and Another
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
